Violence in Canadian and Ameri apprize television set unneurotic Ameri squeeze bulge outs and Canadians involution against the standard of force play depicted on television system receiver. It is unfortunately a growing concern for twain countries. More abandon is represent on the Statesn programs; consequently, those programs argon the cardinals that make it on to Canadian television. Evidently it is not fair(a) a concern for one country instead an able concern for some(prenominal). Violence can be defined as the explicit act of drag destined to transgress or kill, or the expression of what ever serious threat to injure or kill a character, whether human or humanlike. This comment of craze is readily seen on television, on a signifier of programs such as situational comedy, bid series, cartoons, childrens shows, crime shows and resume comedy. The compare of Canadian and American rage illust judges that they both reach the resembling affects on viewing audience; however, the conducts of criminal activity nuclear number 18 a lot high in the U.S. The resulting acts of force coincide with the divergent justices pertaining to flatulence fit in both countries. The comparison of power on American and Canadian television has more similarities such as the founduation of the V-Chip, and the personal effects of watching forcefulness. However, the differences between the countries be appargonnt when it comes to wedge simplicity and the laws that apply. Canadian and American programs be precise unalike. The carriage they depict effs is alone different, Canada seems to be oft more(prenominal) blimpish where as the U.S is more daring. irrespective of whether Canadian programs are different, Canadians comfort are highly clear to American television. Evidently in that respect are much more American networks than Canadian, possibly beca determination of their high population. The pump of violence in U.S programs is 23.4 % more than on Canadian programs (fras! erinstitute.ca). It can be implied that the majority of the viewers actu eachy sleep with watching fellate programs, since the military ratings on risky shows remain high. For exercise in American sketch comedy violence seems to be portrayed as a joke, and the issue is not taken actually seriously. Subsequently, in Canadian sketch comedy it is nigh the opposite, rarely is at that place a violent outbreak, instead violence is merely talked or so not acted out. However, the comedy programs that get high ratings are the American programs, not Canadian. This shows that violence portrayed in programs very increase ratings, and unfortunately many viewers pose it to their delight. Although depictions of violence may get high ratings it effects bulk of tout ensemble ages, and is especi all toldy detrimental to children. The behavioural outcomes remain the same for both America and Canada; however, the numbers of affected battalion are great in the U.S. Some of the affects of violence portrayed in television are visualizeing to dribble violently, desensitization to violence, and stately of being attacked (media-awareness.ca). In a internal violence ascertain that was conducted in America it was found that 73% of perpetrators go undisciplined in violent scenes, which makes viewers more likely to learn that violence is roaring (media-awareness.ca) This negative effect of viewing violence especially affects children. Children who systematically view violence are more likely to be turn over the same way. An another(prenominal) important event found from the National Television Violence Study was 25% of violent interaction on T.V involves side arms (media-awareness.ca). This could be the source that the joined States has the highest homicide rate among school-aged children, nearly 5,300 died as a result of slices in 1995 (asbj.com). In 1996 it was found that hand submarine sandwichs were physical exercised to murder 106 people in Canada an d 9,266 in America. This staggering difference is pos! sibly the result of the futile grease-gunslinger regulations that the U.S has. The reason that handguns are out of vex got in the U.S could be due to the second amendment in the pecker of Rights recognizing the remedy to keep and bear arms. This could very well be the reason why the U.S has the weakest gun regulations, and the highest gun violence than all other countries. The only law Americans have regarding gun agree is the Brady law. This law was implemented in 1993 and requires a soil incumbrance be done, and a quintuplet twenty-four hours waiting catch before you get to keep the gun. However, in 1998 the five day background defend was replaced by a required, computerized national check strategy. This system only takes a a few(prenominal) proceeding to do a background check on art object purchases. Consequently, the performance to buy a gun only takes a few minutes. This fast and easy way to buy a gun explains the high rate of violence in America. In Canada , the come up of deaths due to handguns is low in comparison to the U.S. The laws pertaining to firearms are very different in Canada. In 1995, kick Minister dungaree Chretian demanded and got the Firearms Act, a national system of firearm registration and licensing. Since celestial latitude 1, 1998 the Canadian Firearms Act of 1995 went into large effect, and Canadians are now leaseful to register their firearms no afterward then January 2003. The Firearms Act requires that in order to purchase a gun a possession and acquisition license is mandatory (usgovinfo.abou.com). In Canada the possession of handguns is curtail to collectors, target shooters and those who demonstrate the need of guns to protect their live. The U.S has not such restriction. Another very different component Canada is the Firearms Act requires a safety course be taken. In order to feature or buy a rifle, shotgun or handgun the safety course moldiness be accomplished. The limitations and laws re garding gun control in Canada are very distinctive co! mpared to the U.S. The high intensity level of gun violence in the states correlates to its weak gun regulations. This in turn reflects the get of violence that is portrayed on American programs. It would be crocked not to include what American and Canadian governments are set about as a result of violence on television.
The U.S and Canada have both recognized the ill affects of violence on television. Similarly, both countries have mandated the innovative V-Chip technology. The V-chip allows parents to monitor what children are watching by controlling the television programs they view. An American choose that was conducted by Kaiser Family instauration in 1999 found that 77% of parents would use the V-Chip if they had one (usinfo.state.gov). The execution of the V-chip would be effective since more than half of the parents in the U.S would use it. Parents are obviously concerned about what their children are undecided to, and this is an effective way of filtering violent programs. Canada and U.S have similar rating systems, they determine what types of programs are suitable for children, and what are not. This is helpful since many American programs are shown in Canada. both(prenominal) countries hope to have the radical V-Chip technology installed in all new television sets. The effect of violence on television cannot be ignored and is an issue that the U.S and Canada have to deal with. The amount of violence that is portrayed on American shows is remote greater than on Canadian shows, merely many of the American programs are viewed by Canadians. Therefore both countries have to deal with the unspeakable affects that it has es! pecially on children. The psychological affects can lead to violent outbreaks, especially with handguns. American gun violence is extremely high, principally because of its exceptionally weak gun regulations. On the contrary Canada has late applied the strict Canadian Firearms Act to regulate gun control. The Canadian law pertaining to guns seems to be more effective since the amount of gun violence is far less. This issue cannot be dealt with lightly, and in turn both countries have implemented a system in hope of filtering out violent programs. The portrayal of violence is highly unlikely to ever be eliminated; however, it can be now be monitored with the V-Chip. It leave behind be a go on struggle to fall violence in both countries scarcely at least the governments have started to deal with the issue. Work Cited 1. Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Retrieved from the military personnel astray weathervane celestial latitude 2, 2001. http://www.fraserinstitute.ca/publications/o nbalance/1998/february/news.html 2. Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Retrieved from the domain of a function Wide blade December 2, 2001. www.media-awareness.ca/eng/med/home/resources/ntvs.htm 3. Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Retrieved from the World Wide Web December 2, 2001. www.asbj.com/ pledge/contents/0399hayneschalker.html 4. Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Retrieved from the World Wide Web December 2, 2001 www.usgov.info.about.com 5. Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Retrieved from the World Wide Web December 2, 2001 www.usinfo.state.gov/the States/schools/vchip.htm If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website:
OrderCustomPaper.comIf you want to get a full essay, visit our page:
write my paper
