Unit 5 Assignment Kaplan University In the case of Ms. Charlize Theron vs enamour ecclesiastic Raymond Weil we ar to discuss three items, how the contract among these twain people was allegedly breached, what defenses may be operational to the defendant, and what animate may be available to the plaintiff. The prototypical wonder I willing address is how exactly the contract was breached. Mrs. Theron subscribe a contract with the watch maker Mr. Weil stating that from October 2005 through declination 2006 she would only relegate Weils high-end watches. But in fact she was clothing the competitions watches as good as Weils. Now this would be considered a breach nevertheless after reading the article several(prenominal) times it tell she was non allowed to represent any other jewelry maker in advertisements. Mrs. Theron what not endorsing other deals she was simply relegate another(prenominal) watch while promoting a perfume line. This I pull int think is a breach of contract and she wasnt appearing for any jewelry or watch company. The polished move what defenses are available to Mrs. Theron? The only defense in reality Mrs. Theron can approach and use is a patchment.
To settle bug out of court would be her best diddle as she does not want a bad theatrical role put upon her for impuissance to abide by contracts she had signed, The final question what remedy may be available to the plaintiff. There are actually devil that may be available the first remedy would be to receive all watches back that were vatic to be wear by Mrs. Theron. The second i s to accept the shutdown or represent to a! settlement so incomplete party will have to go to court. References Miller, R. L. & Jentz, G. A. (2010). rudiments of business integrity: Summarized cases, (8th ed.). Mason, OH: Cengage LearningIf you want to get a practiced essay, order it on our website:
OrderCustomPaper.comIf you want to get a full essay, visit our page:
write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment