'Crime Against Women Essay\r'

'Although, women whitethorn be victims of all kinds of execration, be it cheating, murder, robbery, and so forth, provided the crimes in which only women atomic number 18 victims and which are directed specifically against them are char locomoteerised as â€Å"crime against women”. Broadly, crimes against women are classified down the stairs two categories: (1) Crimes infra the Indian punishable Code (IPC), which include seven crimes: (i) rape, (ii) nobble and abduction, (iii) portion deaths, (iv) torture physical and psychic (including wife battering), (v) molestation, and (vi) sexual harassment, and (vii) importation of girls. (2) Crimes under Special and Local Laws (SLL), which include 17 crimes, of which the important mavins are: (i) immoral craft (1956 and 1978 Act), (ii) dowry prohibition (1961 Act), (iii) committing Sati (1987 Act), and (iv) indecent federal agency of women (1986 Act).\r\nIt is equally important to clarify the model of ‘ military grou p’ against women. If we take ‘violence’ as â€Å"conduct which incurs the formal pronouncements of the moral denunciation of the community,” or â€Å"deviation from conduct norms of the prescriptive groups”, the scope of cases of ‘violence against women’ becomes too broad. Narrowly, the call ‘violence’ has been applied to â€Å"physically hitting an individual and cause spot” (Kempe, 1982; Gil, 1970), to â€Å"the act of striking a person with the role of do harm or blemish but not actually causing it” (Gelles and Strauss, 1979), to â€Å"acts where there is the high potential of causing injury” (Strauss, 1980), and to â€Å"acts which may not take aim actual hitting but may involve verbal abuse or psychological stress and suffering”.\r\nMegargee (1982: 85) has delimitate violence as the â€Å"overtly jeopardize or overtly accomplished occupation of force which results in the injury or destruction of persons or their reputation.” While spirit the concept of ‘violence’ and distinguishing it from concepts like ‘ onset’, ‘force’, and ‘coercion’, is both required and desirable, there is always the fear of acquire bogged down in controversies relating to these concepts raised by various scholars. As a result, one may miss the very procedure of understanding broader aspects of the problem of â€Å"crime and violence against women”. ‘Violence’ must be appreciate as a human phenomenon inasmuch as it consists of an act of one person which encroaches upon the independence of another (Domenach, 1981: 30).\r\nHere, we consider the operational exposition of violence as â€Å"force, whether overt or covert, used to wrest from the individual (the cleaning lady) something that she does not want to give of her own expel will and which causes her either physical injury or emotional trauma or both”. Thus, rape, abduction, kidnapping, murder (all cases of criminal violence), dowry death, wife battering, sexual abuse, maltreatment of a widow and/or an elderly woman (all cases of domestic violence) and eve-teasing, forcing wife/daughter-in-law to go for feticide, forcing a young widow to commit sati, etc. (all cases of social violence), are issues which affect a large section of society.\r\nIn the digest of the problem of ‘crime against women’, we may management on important issues like reputation and extent of female crime in India, on identifying women who are generally victims of crime and violence, on those who are the perpetrators of crime and violence, on what motivates criminals to commit crimes or victimisers to use violence, and on measures which could contain the depersonalisation trauma of the victims.\r\n'