Barack Obama: The Audacity of Hope

The run-in The boldness of Hope comes from Obamas 2004 Democratic Convention keynote address. lots of the book deal with Obamas policy positions on a issue forth of issues, from health care to the occupation of Iraq. In this book, Obama criticizes the existing policy positions of the crotch hair government, and tries to reconcile political differences based on the twin principles of respect and statesmanship. thither are several issues that Obama discussed in the book. The first issue is about racial discrimination. Obama rejects the notion that the United States is divided into politically racial spheres.Obama argues that the so-called racial divide is a social construction hence, cannot be immersed in policy-making. The ad hominem attributes of people, agree to Obama, should not become a hindrance to their own development. The secondly issue is rather unusual for the common reader. Obama rejects the either or formulations as a matter of policy. Here, he is referring to Ge orge W. pubic hair absolutists foreign policy that does not take into consideration alternatives. Obama provides a world-wide background of such policy in the 60s.According to Obama, the admission of African-Americans, minorities, and women to full citizenship had greatly undermined the power of the racial majority. What had developed was a system of grudge that, even today, manifests itself in government, business, education, and defense. The consistency of the American nation had been greatly undermined. Obama argues that the entirely means to restore that genius is to struggleds reconciling political differences. Although this is difficult to achieve, the price of success far outweighs the short costs.Obamas idea of subject area amity transcends race, creed, and political differences. His idea of unity resembles that of Martin Luther King. Much of Obamas thoughts on foreign, military, and domestic policies are a general triangulation of liberal and conservative ideas pro bably a way to appease both(prenominal) liberals and conservatives in society as Tony Blair did. In any case, his ideas about national security are much more(prenominal) enlightened than that of Bush. Obamas argues that war in Iraq was a misguided war on the basis that it increase the associated risks to the United States.It did not put an end to terrorism, rather magnified it threefold. Tolerance, according to Obama must be observed in domestic and foreign policies. This is the only way to achieve an everlasting peace. The thesis of the book is Unity of the American nation transcends race, creed, and politics, and the way to achieve peace is tolerance. For an intelligent reader, this thesis is more or lessthing more of a vague statement. It does not attempt to give special solutions to specific problems. There is no evaluation of alternatives.It is even possible to argue that Obamas thesis is a coagulation of his political motives a desire for higher(prenominal) political offi ce. In any case, unlike his predecessors, Obamas attempts to give a general view of American policies are generally unbiased and to some extent open-ended. Much of his enthusiasm of a possible end of engagement in Iraq is generally based on the hopes of a policy-shift whether a republican or Democrat is elected to the White House. Here, one can know that Obamas audacity in intellectual leadership in his political party exceeded that of George W. Bush.One can therefore argue that even if Obamas thesis is a motherhood statement, it is in fact a radical alternative of the conservative-either-or policies of the Bush administration. Here, one sees the views of both a rising politician and a escapist of the 1960s. Again, the specification of Obamas thesis is still problematic, even though it carries a very meaningful radical policy-shift. In any case, there is no end to the question, Is unity a long-run possibility? Reference Obama, Barack. 2006. The Audacity of Hope Thoughts on Rec laiming the American Dream. New York Crown.